-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Eran Tromer wrote:
> That's true in regard to writes, but for reads RAID1 is faster. For
> example, consider a system doing extensive reads concurrently from two
> files stored far apart on the (logical) disk. In RAID1 there are two
> copies of the data, each with an independent disk head assembly, so
> (with a good implementation) you'll end up having one disk serving the
> first file and the second serving the second file, and each will only do
> small disk head seeks. In RAID0, each disk contains the sole copy of
> half the data in each file, so the heads will have to do long seeks back
> and forth. A good disk scheduler would improve things somewhat, but the
> effect is still there.
> 

It's RAID-0 here, so I expect the performance (read, write and overall)
to be better. What's ruining the performance is a disbalance between
disks. What causes this disbalance -- that's the question.

- --




- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Leonid Podolny       |   /"\
                      |   \ /     ASCII Ribbon Campaign
 leonidp(at)gmail.com |    x      Against HTML Mail
 +972-54-5696948      |   / \
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
PGP fingerprint:      51B2 F1DB 485E 2C48 2E17  94D1 7EC4 E524 B156 B9F0
PGP key:    http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xB156B9F0
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCU72+fsTlJLFWufARAjgFAJ0etSlDzMP8HlSoPBpZ4gKtC2DlCwCeLKsT
30zM0mFSnypoKb5u3p+glx4=
=/mgf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to