Re: weirdest problem ticket opened today.

[Ez-Aton]

Not guilty. It was momentary lack of sanity, which can be explained easily by understanding the defendant's status at the time, as well as his questionable and unreasonable decision to use # on a server, being under the influence of alcoholic substance. The defendant has learned his lesson since, and will never DUI again. One time is enough (as Mulix has learned too, during his experiments). Moreover, there is no backup since (due to data size limits, and physical limits), but on the new server to be, which the defendant has forwarded, an anti DUI mechanism will be installed and activated, for the benefit of all. Windows 3.1 is a severe punishment, and cannot be accomplished on any modern machine. However, the defendant will voluntarily install Windows NT Server on his VMWare, and will try to use it, as a suiting punishment. Ez. Arik Baratz wrote: On 21/04/05, Ez-Aton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It's not a contest I want to win in. It happened once, and the backups were one week old. Yep. Bad luck. Yeah, bad luck. And I quote from your own words: "I played with a spare disk (small one) I had, and a backup script, using tar... It happened that I was very drunk that night, and it seemed like the best idea to play with the script" Your honor, this is a clear and cut case of DUI - Debugging Under the Influence. The accused was trying to hide his actions, as is plainly clear from his words again: "...a user starts "talk"int to me, saying he can't login to his home dir... I've explained there are some maintanance works on the server, and that it will be ok by morning. He claimed he can't read his mail using pine (wonder why...), and I've used the same explanation..." After this overwhelming evidence, the prosecution demands that the accused will receive the maximum penalty set for DUI in the law: Running Windows 3.10 for 3 years. -- Arik