It is my understanding that XFS mechanism do a lot of caching to memory
to achieve good performance. This is a consideration between stability
in the case of catastrophy to performance.
Regards,
tzahi.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gil Freund
> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 6:56 PM
> To: IGLU Mailing list
> Subject: VMware GSX host file systems
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am planning on deploying VMware GSX on a Debian system.
> While I am happy with ReiserFS for most FS needs, I am
> wondering if it would make sense to user XFS or JFS for the
> VM image partition, as it seems both perform better with large files.
>
> On a side note, can anyone share information on performance
> of the ESX product vs. the GSX product on Linux? Aside from
> memory over-committing, most ESX functions (such as vMotion)
> are not relevant to me.
>
> Thanks
>
> Gil
>
> ======================
> To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run
> the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
