Yeah, but if you do a sequential scan of a big something the cache
will never be actually used (at least for it).
Of course, I am talking about non-executable files.
It also caches executable files which is what we use right?
Question is, if it includes those executable files in the "cached" in
top.
Better that it not, since I don't need the code to keep reloading also.
Not that it really matters since my code is not so long and it
reasonably
should't be dumped at all (I think).
Regards,
tzahi.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Muli Ben-Yehuda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2005 6:34 PM
> To: Tzahi Fadida
> Cc: 'guy keren'; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: cleaning memory.
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 02:35:32PM +0200, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
>
> > btw, the cache does not seem to drop under 5mb for some
> reason. I am
> > interested to know why.
>
> Things that are used are cached. You're always using *something*.
>
> Cheers,
> Muli
> --
> Muli Ben-Yehuda
> http://www.mulix.org | http://mulix.livejournal.com/
>
>
>
=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
