On Sep 26, 12:38, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
} Subject: Re: Actcom without a dailer costs more
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 12:25:36PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Sep 26, 10:26, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
> > } Subject: Re: Actcom without a dailer costs more
> > 3. Even though routers are tend to connect 24x7, yet with dynamic IPs
> > there is still a need for significantly less IPs.
>
> Care to explain why? Not on-average, but for those who do have 24x7
> connections. I do realize that if you give a static IP to every customer,
> there is still a significant percentage that are far from 24x7, and they
> would need much fewer addresses if they are dynamic.
Some customers which have routers close them when they don't use their
Internet connection (some private customers and many business customers
like stores). Some others close on vacations. However, by definition,
those who have 24x7 connections use them 24x7...
> > > I'd also like to thank you for your sincere and interesting answers.
> >
> > I hope I was of some help here, even though I couldn't tell the "the
> > real price for the ISP to give a user a static IP".
>
> I was misunderstood - I did not intend to thank you for an answer to my
> question (and I also did not expect to get something like "5 NIS/year.
> Happy?"), but for other things you already said and were interesting to
> read.
I wanted to point out I didn't neglect your request for the real price,
but just couldn't tell it.
> Thanks,
> --
> Didi
Amir
=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
