Hi, > They bought SCOSource licenses for their Linux systems. That license > allows them to only use certain "blessed" versions of the Linux kernel > (binary only). Quite a severe limitation, IMHO.
And they cancelled the license deal with SCO. The press seems to "forget" to publish such small things like this. > But if a company has its Linux servers limited by SCO's binary-only > usage license? As I wrote to Omer, You can do whatever you want with this machine. Want to install Debian Potato? Sarge? SID? 2.2/2.4/2.6 kernel? feel free - it's your own machine, use it as you like. and I didn't see anything mentioned regarding kernel or binaries on the agreement when I took their services (and in their case, I DID read their agreement, all of it) Thanks, Hetz ================================================================To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
