Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
guy keren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


you'll have to forgive oleg for not understanding why you're
bothered - he probably did not mess with gentoo and with its ebuild
system.


No, I haven't. But I still don't understand what the big deal is.

Here is the memory usage on my fully updated ("install everything" and
more) 64-bit FC4 on which I am typing this email:

            total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
Mem:       1020000     464112     555888          0      35580     276324
-/+ buffers/cache:     152208     867792
Swap:      2097144          0    2097144

Used memory minus buffers and cache - 150MB. This is with the normal
(for workstation) services running + sendmail + KDE3.5.

And here is another computer I have at home - totally obsolete RH7.3
on a PIII:

Mem:        126308     119696       6612          0      79992      27252
-/+ buffers/cache:      12452     113856
Swap:      1020088      27752     992336

(it is not doing much at the moment, I grant you, but it looks very
happy with 128MB of RAM).
So, I really don't think that Gentoo has a monopoly on
efficiency. Yosef does not badly at all until he starts Matlab, or so
it seems to me.

You're right, but...

I just checked the box at my parents' house that's still running Gentoo. It has a pretty close configuration, and it runs the same processes +- (no hald, but with Samba and [EMAIL PROTECTED]). free reports only 91 MB used (not counting buffered/cached). that's 60 MB less! I don't need them to run my lungs, but it's still a big difference! And X is installed with most use-flags on.

--
 Keep on rocking in a free world!

=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to