On Sun, 2006-12-17 at 11:01 +0200, Oded Arbel wrote: > On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 12:41 +0200, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote: > > 2. As I have said many times, there is a popular program which the owners > > released as GPL, solicited and added source code for new features > > and bug fixes provided as GPL'ed code and then sold closed source > > licenses to large companies. > > I <std-disclaimer>while supposedly having vested interest in the thus > unnamed company</std-disclaimer>, would like to point that this practice > - while it indeed makes some people very angry (see previous poster's > e-mail) - is perfectly legal
After reading Geoffrey S. Mendelson's latest post (see: "GPL license from software in question") I understood that we are talking about two different companies and two different products, hence I'd like to retract everything I said above, and admit that I have no idea what he's talking about. That's what happens when everyone keeps referring to "unnamed" companies and people and what is commonly known in hebrew as "דו שיח של חרשים" ;-) -- Oded ::.. <chip> "on topic for #perl" is like "relevant to misc.misc" ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
