You are right. I stand corrected. Ghiora Oded Arbel wrote: > On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 22:32 +0300, Ghiora Drori wrote: >> In the following RFC : >> http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html >> It says the browser can be told NOT to cache the page. > > No, it doesn't. Read: > >> quote:14.9.1 What is Cacheable >> ...... >> private >> Indicates that all or part of the response message is intended for a >> single user and MUST NOT be cached by a shared cache. This allows an >> origin server to state that the specified parts of the >> response are intended for only one user and are not a valid response >> for requests by other users. A private (non-shared) cache MAY cache the >> response. > >> I would assume an email server would use it. Anyone know if yahoo email >> does? Anyone know if IE5 does respond properly. fRom What I can see it >> does not. > > I don't understand why you think IE5 does not respond properly. You have > to remember that the cache used by a browser is of the "private > (non-shared)" type and hence may store pages marked as "private". The > only type of cache that may not store private pages is a web proxy's > cache. >
================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
