Hi, If you decide to do without validation, then I've used TinyXML in a couple of projects, and am pretty happy with the footprint & performance. http://www.grinninglizard.com/tinyxml/
Your right in that it will require you to write the parser manually, though, with all that that implies. Cheers, Rony -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Amos Shapira Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 2:56 AM To: Israel Linux Mailing list Subject: Efficient C++ XML validating parser? Hello, Currently we use Xerces for C (http://xerces.apache.org/xerces-c/) to read XML files but are looking at making this as efficient as possible. The XML files are generated by our own software so some of us though that maybe we can get rid of validation of the input and go straight to event handling using SAX parsers. My concern with this approach is that it sounds like we'll end up with a hand-written parser for very specific version of the input schema, which will require us to keep the code in pace with changes in the schema. Instead, I was wondering what would be the best way to ask the XML parser to validate the input. Maybe some tool which converts an XML schema to tightly integrated C++ code would do the trick? I found http://tinyurl.com/2wqqp8 but it's just a research paper (NOT free), not open source code. What do people around here like to use for EFFICIENT XML parsing? Thanks, --Amos ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
