Hi, This is the beginning of Shachar's posting: Quote ( bold mine): Libtool is a* great tool*, and it fits nicely with automake and autoconf, making it extremely simple to just take a new project, write a few (less than 10) lines to instructions, and get a project that already builds static and shared libraries, including support for cross build, out of tree builds, make install/uninstall, strip and even packaging the sources into a distribution tar ball. Just great.
I happen to disagree and I can say so even if any of you do not like it. This does not mean I have to fix Shachar's problem or even look at at it, If you are looking for a fight I am not interested. Ghiora On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 1:38 AM, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 09:54:34AM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > > Ghiora Drori wrote: > > >> Use cmake. It is much better then the gnu tool builder stuff. And it > >> is free. > > > 2. How does cmake handle this problem differently? > > I'll note that with all of your cmake advocacy, you still haven't > answered Shachar's original question (which Oron did, for autotools). > > -- > Tzafrir Cohen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | VIM is > http://tzafrir.org.il | | a Mutt's > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | best > ICQ# 16849754 | | friend > > ================================================================= > To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command > echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Constant change is here to stay!
