Correction: IDT, not IST --- On Fri, 3/27/09, e2xbegqsdyt21hfc <e2xbegqsdyt21...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Due to IST, there was no such time as "27 MAR 2009 02:54:00". ^ IDT > $ date -s "27 MAR 2009 02:14:00" > date: invalid date `27 MAR 2009 02:14:00' > $ date -s "27 MAR 2009 02:01:00" > date: invalid date `27 MAR 2009 02:01:00' > > --- On Fri, 3/27/09, Hetz Ben Hamo <het...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > From: Hetz Ben Hamo <het...@gmail.com> > > Subject: bug in date? > > To: "linux-il" <linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il> > > Date: Friday, March 27, 2009, 1:56 AM > > Hi, > > > > Take a look at this: > > > > # date -s "27 MAR 2009 02:54:00" > > date: invalid date `27 MAR 2009 02:54:00' > > > > However.. > > > > # date -s "27 MAR 2009 03:00:00" > > Fri Mar 27 03:00:00 IDT 2009 > > > > Why is it invalid?? > > > > Thanks, > > Hetz > > -- > > Skepticism is the lazy person's default position. > > my blog (hebrew): http://benhamo.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-il mailing list > > Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il > > http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-il mailing list > Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il > http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il > _______________________________________________ Linux-il mailing list Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il