Erez D wrote:
Try to have gen_c2 return a pointer to c2<int>. That may resolve
the problem.
no, it doesnt.
i am sure that there is a solution to this.
Try to have gen_c2 return a pointer to c2<int>, and place the actual
function body definition after the definition of c2.
If that fails, have gen_c2 return a pointer to c1<int>. As c1<int> is a
public parent of c2<int>, it should amount to almost the same thing.
In any case, having a child function return a copy of a parent class is
bad OO design.
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting Ltd.
http://www.lingnu.com
_______________________________________________
Linux-il mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
