Noam Meltzer wrote:
the time output does looks like you have higher cpu usage for some
reason, so i agree with Shachar on this.
you can also try to pinpoint the place the cpu is spent.
strace and/or ltrace with the '-f -c' flags can help.
I'm not sure about ltrace, but strace will not help. Most of the time is
spent in user space, not in the kernel.
Strace may help if the problem is time spent in another process (i.e. -
while the main process is sleeping), but it seems Noam has already tried
that one and failed to spot any obvious candidates.
Shachar
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Shachar Shemesh <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Noam Rathaus wrote:
I know the time difference doesn't look too bad, but take a
bigger code set:
Fast:
real 0m1.682s
user 0m1.584s
sys 0m0.064s
Slow:
real 0m16.730s
user 0m9.345s
sys 0m0.096s
These times spell "CPU intensive". Does your library do anything
special? If you try to import a dummy library, does this still
happen?
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting Ltd.
http://www.lingnu.com
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting Ltd.
http://www.lingnu.com
_______________________________________________
Linux-il mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il