Hi Gilad,

Have you heard of KVM-lite  ? (KVM that doesn't require virtualization features from processor)

In what sense  "KVM rocks", do we have any benchmark of KVM versus VirtualBox  ?

I saw a post from Ingo Molnar stating that context number of context switches in KVM reduced dramatically with adoption of  VT-d in Intel processor,  and I still wonder how to measure this.

Shana tova le kulam !!

Lev

Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:

Amos Shapira wrote:

2009/9/16 Arie Skliarouk <[email protected]>:
  

Yes. We use xen heavily on CentOS 5 at work and am pretty excited that
RH 5.4 is out with KVM "preview tech", I'm not an expert but got the
impression that KVM might get things better than Xen eventually.
  
Don't mean to dis  Xen or anyone, but...

You can drop the "eventually". KVM rocks :-)

Gilad





_______________________________________________
Linux-il mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il

Reply via email to