fine. - low latency in general - reasonably good VOIP performance - at least 2.5MB asymmetric - no QoS traffic shaping - absolutely no port blocking
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Hetz Ben Hamo <[email protected]> wrote: > Not enough info.. > > Low latency connection to where? BBL maybe sucks in service, but they have > the biggest pipe in IIX for example (10 Gb) (I'm not trying to recommend > them, I'm not their customer).. > > Some do not block ports, but do use QoS to shove the priority of P2P > (torrent, emule) way down... > > Hetz > > 2009/10/26 Justin <[email protected]> > >> I've been with Interal until now. But they are merging with Bezeq Ben >> Liumi. I hate BBL, and more than that their quality sucks. >> >> Does anyone have a recommendation for a Linux friendly ISP, that doesn't >> block ports and can provide reasonable, low latency connections? >> >> >> -- >> There must be a beginning of any great matter, but the continuing unto the >> end until it be thoroughly finished yields the true glory. -- Sir Francis >> Drake >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux-il mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il >> >> > > > -- > Skepticism is the lazy person's default position. > my blog (hebrew): http://benhamo.org > -- There must be a beginning of any great matter, but the continuing unto the end until it be thoroughly finished yields the true glory. -- Sir Francis Drake
_______________________________________________ Linux-il mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
