On 17 February 2010 19:46, Yedidyah Bar-David <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 07:36:28PM +0200, anonymous anonymous wrote: >> >> >> On Feb 17, 2010, at 5:16 PM, Valery Reznic wrote: >> >> > Hi, list >> > >> > Recently Netvision representative contacted me and offered to use >> > Netvision instead of Bezek as my "phone provider" >> > >> > Do you have any experience with them ? >> >> No experience with NV. As far as I know, they are using a well >> established and reliable, phone over internet, technology. > > You know, Mr anonymous anonymous, the fact that your email was sent from > the IP address 89.138.12.205, which according to the RIPE whois Database > is registered for Netvision, does not add much to the credibility of > your post.
I have _bad_ experience with Netvision in the last year, bad enough to ruin the good name that they took eight years to build. Just one year ago it would have _only_ been Netvision, but in the past year it's changed to _anything_but_ Netvision. That said, if they are using the same psuedo-VOIP technology that HOT had, then it is really good. Fax works, and the sound quality is excellent. However, uptime at HOT was terrible, though I suspect that this was more of HOT's incompetence rather than a shortcoming of the technology. -- Dotan Cohen http://what-is-what.com http://gibberish.co.il Please CC me if you want to be sure that I read your message. I do not read all list mail. _______________________________________________ Linux-il mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
