Shachar, On שבת 19 יוני 2010 00:08:26 Shachar Shemesh wrote: > There is no such thing "non-unicode vfat". FAT file systems comes in two > flavors. One is the classic, pre-Windows 95, version, which only > supported ASCII (no Hebrew at all). The other is the LFN extension to > FAT, which is encoded in UTF-16 (i.e. - unicode). In other words, if the > DoK has Hebrew names, they are in Unicode. I am pretty sure I used to write in Hebrew filenames under DOS and Win3.11 (and saw "reversed Hebrew" in my app... I had to reverse it...). When I say "pretty sure", I tell you I wrote code myself.
Can you prove me wrong? What is missing here ? (except me being senile, that might be true) _______________________________________________ Linux-il mailing list Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
