Hi Shachar,
Right again. I had a bug in a macro that defined the class name. In fact
all of the methods bodies were implemented outside the class.
Thanks,
- yba
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:46:41 +0300
From: Shachar Shemesh <[email protected]>
To: Jonathan Ben Avraham <[email protected]>
Cc: ILUG <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [YBA] g++ newbie: No warn on missing method implementation?
Jonathan Ben Avraham wrote:
Hi Shachar,
Right, right.
I also think that the VS2008 is doing something "extra".
My problem is that I have a class with 70+ methods and the customer keeps
changing the
specs. I need some way to verify that all of the methods declared in the
class have
implementations. The most common mistake is that I change the method name
in the class
but forget to change the name in the implementation.
That would not compile. The implementation under the old name would not match
any method
declaration, and the compiler would complain.
Shachar
I suppose that I could write a Perl script that would automatically
generate method
calls from the class method declarations and then watch for link errors.
Regards,
- yba
--
EE 77 7F 30 4A 64 2E C5 83 5F E7 49 A6 82 29 BA ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- [email protected] - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -_______________________________________________
Linux-il mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
