What about Acronis and stuff like that? 2010/10/12 Etzion Bar-Noy <[email protected]>
> I don't know about Bacula and Windows, but the requirement was that the > server runs on Windows, right? > ArcServ is a lousy product. Easier to backup. Harder to restore. > Symantec product is OK. You will not have the ability to restore from > bare-metal without some major work, however, you can create (if you have > enough time) a unified bootable USB disk which can run Linux OS with backup > agent to achieve bare-metal. > > BE is a better and more reliable. I would strongly recommend on it, from > the portfolio of non-OSS solutions. > > Ez > > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Avi Rozen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Ira Abramov wrote: >> > Bacula and AMANDA are probably not options since they won't use shadow >> > copies thus can't back up databases swiftly and restore them partially >> > and intelligently like propriatary tools do. >> > >> >> I'm in no position to compare it with other backup solutions, but I do >> know that Bacula can use the volume shadow copy service on windows [1], >> since version 1.37.x (current version is 5.0.x). >> >> Cheers, >> Avi >> >> >> [1] >> >> http://www.bacula.org/5.0.x-manuals/en/main/main/Windows_Version_Bacula.html#SECTION003760000000000000000 >> >> >> This mail was sent via Mail-SeCure system. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux-il mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-il mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il > >
_______________________________________________ Linux-il mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
