On Sun, Apr 03, 2011, Ariel Biener wrote about "Re: Linux has won!": > On 04/03/2011 02:33 PM, Nadav Har'El wrote: > > Sorry for top posting. I think however that you're wrong. > > As a desktop platform, Linux has not won, and that was what
But line of reasoning brings, as I exlained, two questions: 1. There is a trend of the traditional "desktop" being replaced, or just eclipsed, by "alternative" devices, such as tablets, smartphones, tvs, streamers, networked hard disks, etc. If all of these use Linux but traditional "desktops" still don't, in what sense has Windows continued to win? 2. If people get used to alternative UIs from all these devices, what will they have left as an excuse to choose the expensive Windows and Office on their desktop? -- Nadav Har'El | Sunday, Apr 3 2011, 29 Adar II 5771 [email protected] |----------------------------------------- Phone +972-523-790466, ICQ 13349191 |"God is dead." - Nietzsche; "Nietzsche is http://nadav.harel.org.il |dead" - God _______________________________________________ Linux-il mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
