Shachar Shemesh <[email protected]> writes: > Just tested it myself. It does, indeed, not work. I wonder why? > Seems like it SHOULD work. After all, that's what volatile is for, > right?
I suspected that const was more important than volatile, but it looks (after I removed const) that what overrules volatile is the fact that nothing uses the static variable (or const) - the compiler does not care that it was declared volatile. -- Oleg Goldshmidt | [email protected] _______________________________________________ Linux-il mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
