On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:18:43PM +0200, geoffrey mendelson wrote: > > On Oct 24, 2011, at 7:26 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote: > >> Well, from what I understood, it's just that Stallman in his visit to >> the Palestinian Authority, complied to the demands of his Palestinian >> sponsors, >> and wouldn't lecture at a place that didn't support the boycott of the >> Israeli >> academia. That wasn't a global position of the Free Software >> Foundation, who >> certainly isn't anti-Semitic (see >> http://www.shlomifish.org/philosophy/politics/define-zionism/ about a >> lot of this confusion.). > > > You understand wrong. Since Stallman signed his messages as President of > the FSF, they are legally the position of the FSF.
IANAL and thus IDCALI. Stallman did this as a private person. -- Tzafrir Cohen | [email protected] | VIM is http://tzafrir.org.il | | a Mutt's [email protected] | | best [email protected] | | friend _______________________________________________ Linux-il mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
