> As usual, because Hspell is open-source, proprietary software writers > have the option to fully evaluate every aspect of Hspell, and its > suitability for their product, before they decide to use it. But if they > do use it, they should indeed not use the AGPL but rather negotiate a > special > license from us. >
This sounds perfectly fair, but may I respectfully suggest that you make a (negotiable) commercial license an explicit option? While you do suggest contacting you in case of need, the suggestion immediately follows a rather strongly worded statement that using hspell in a closed-source service is no longer acceptable. -- Oleg Goldshmidt | [email protected] <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ Linux-il mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
