VeraCrypt is fork which continue the TrueCrypt legacy, TrueCrypt had some audit (crowd source founded) on the encryption part (algorithm and stuff), the boot loader, and the windows kernel driver (IIRC).
they found few vulnerabilities at first (3 I think), but nothing critical, and they were patched in VeraCrypt. next was a bug in the windows driver which allowed a user/process to gain SYSTEM privileges. which also was patched. -- Rabin On 17 November 2015 at 12:51, Erez D <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Rabin Yasharzadehe <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> TrueCrypt ? >> > just reading about it ;-) > however it is unmaintained (should i use veracrypt ? no audit done on it,) > and i do not need all this functionality > > what i liked about ecryptfs is that it is the default ubuntu encryption > (which raise my trust in it), and that it encrypts file by file rather than > volume (which better fits to running it over dropbox or gdrive) > >> >> -- >> Rabin >> >> On 17 November 2015 at 11:27, Erez D <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hello >>> >>> It is very nice to hold some data on the cloud accessible from everywhere >>> however if i do not want the cloud to have access to it, it requires >>> encryption >>> >>> i could mount gdrive, dropbox or other cloud fs localy >>> and mount ecryptfs on it so i have transparent encryption >>> >>> my only problem is that it works on linux only >>> >>> does anyone knows a way of having a portable transparent encryption >>> which will support linux, and windows ? >>> (would be nice if it will also support android (even if i can not >>> insmod) and ios) >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Linux-il mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il >>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ Linux-il mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
