On 23 May 00, at 19:38, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> 1. Spammers were hard to trace on the digest (that was me) :)
Spam hunters, you included, should go in for the "single" each
version. Since the digest is prepared only after a msg has gone to
each user subscribed to m*domo as each, the chances that a spam gets
through in a digest are little. There's not much spam on LI, is
there?? Though open relay exploits are
> 2. Someone wanted the X-Mailer / User-Agent headers visible (perhaps [s]he
> wanted to do a survey of what mailers the list is using ...
Hell!! If some one is sooo inquisitive, try Samspade.
> Thaths finally gave in and went back to full headers in the digest.
Poor me!! Am stuck.
> FWIW, you _can_ control the number of messages you get per digest, number
> of digests you get per day etc etc. There's some kinda command in
> majordomo (send faq I think) which will send you a majordomo faq with all
> relevant commands.
That I have, but I wanted to suppress the headers.
========================================
Sthitaprajna
@mailandnews.com
========================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the 'What to do before posting to the list' site
for a list of things to try before posting. The site is
at http://botsie.tripod.com/beforeposting/
