Ravikant K.Rao saw fit to inform LI that: 

>
>       pico? *LART* -- Well, if you *must* use pico, use atleast
>nano, an advanced version of pico, better designed and configured.

I used it - and recommended it to the list in fact.  Nano is _slightly_
broken on solaris - esp re word wraps, cutting text etc.

Haven't compiled it on my linux box (first tested it on my office sun box,
and after some prolonged, heavy use, figured that pico is far better, no
bugs)

>       beh, XEmacs owns us all ;)

That bloated [browser|editor|mailer|wtf_ever_you_want]?  No thanks ;)

>Architecture: i386
>Version: 0.8.6-2

0.9.x is the latest imho.

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian + [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I went to the race track once and bet on a horse that was so good that
it took seven others to beat him!

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information on the LIH mailing list see:
http://lists.linux-india.org/lists/LIH

Reply via email to