Hi,

Sthitaprajna typed:
> > xmutt is a completely new binary ( not to be mixed with the usual
> > mutt binary ).
> AFAIK, this x functionality is built into mutt, ie this xmutt allows
> you to use mutt within x. Is it a completely different binary? I
> download the source and compile mutt without any x option and it
> seems to work fine.

Yeah - the standard distribution of mutt does *not* have this xmutt.
And anyway, whats the difference between xmutt and using mutt in a
terminal?

PS: I didn't even find xmutt on freshmeat.

-- 
Mrinal Kalakrishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://mrinal.dhs.org/
Linux 2.2.16 || PGP:B1E86F5B || Mutt 1.3.3i (2000-06-09) || VIM 5.6 
-- 
"If you want to travel around the world and be invited to speak at a lot
of different places, just write a Unix operating system."
(By Linus Torvalds)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
LIH is all for free speech.  But it was created for a purpose - to help
people discuss issues about installing and running Linux.  If your
messages are counterproductive to this purpose, your privileges to
submit messages can and will be revoked.

Reply via email to