---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:19:30 -0700 From: Sudhakar Chandra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LIH] Re: [TwinCLinG] ILUG reps Indraneel Majumdar proclaimed: > On Fri, 11 Aug 2000, partha wrote: > > Besides, I have some strong and not very conforming views on this > > attempt to institutionalise ilug. Linux grew up to its present strenghts > > not by institutionalising it. Just think about it. Partha, Any view, including a view that there is no need to institutionalize Linux India, is welcome. If the nominees in the li-registration committee decide that there is no need to create a nation-wide body, we should respect the outcome. > My views exactly. I vote for this decision even though it does not seem to > be on the ballot paper. Maybe all can make better decisions if we know > what the representative is supposed to be doing. The ILUG representative in the li registration commitee is going to be representing their ILUG. The commitee is going to decide whethere is there is a need for a nationwide body. And if there is a nation-wide body, what role does it play and how autonomous are the ILUGs etc. Thaths PS: Since I am not subscribed to ilughyd I did not see the history behind these comments. -- Homer: Mel Gibson is just a guy Marge, no different than me or Lenny. Marge: Were you or Lenny ever named Sexiest Man Alive? Homer: Hmmm, I'm not certain about Lenny ... Sudhakar C13n http://www.aunet.org/thaths/ Lead Indentured Slave ---------------------------------------------- The mailing list archives are available at http://lists.linux-india.org/cgi-bin/wilma/LIH
