On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 02:06:15AM +0530, Binand Raj S. wrote:
> Gaurav Priyolkar forced the electrons to say:
> > (I am posting this a second time hoping that someone who missed it the
> > last time may be able to help.)
> 
> Well, I missed it the last time :-)

Thought so ... ditto for Suresh I'm sure.
(Or were our Mutt Support Engineers sleeping on the job ;-) 

> Sorry guy, there is no way mutt would do that. If you lost mails from a
> folder, then most likely it is because of some other method you (or

Nope.

> someone else) used to access your mailbox, not mutt's fault.

Nix.
 
> Please - don't blame mutt (TM). mutt respects your mails - it will never
> do anything destructive. Are you sure $folder was not the same as the
> original folder? In which case, it is Unix who is the culprit, for not
> providing a method of in-place editing.
 
$folder ne $original_folder
Even if it were though, I was appending (>>), so should not be a problem.

I was hoping if maybe you could try the same thing and tell me what
happened. 

> > Ultimate file compression:   'rm -rf /'    (100% compression)
> 
> Maybe someone on your computer used your own compression routine in a
> limited way?

He-he (This is the second time I have benn ribbed about that:-) 
No ... home machine, _MY_ machine.

-Gaurav

[note: Old .sig was fired ... tho the new guy doesn't seem too
promising under the circumstances] 

-- 
Sleep:  A completely inadequate substitute for caffeine.


----------------------------------------------
LIH is all for free speech.  But it was created
for a purpose.  Violations of the rules of
this list will result in stern action.

Reply via email to