On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> I meant how can you run a program that contains dlopen without linking it to
> libc? dlopen depends upon libdl.so or any such thing. If it's dependent on libc
> some way down, how does your effort justify opening libc separately?
Because I am playing with the functions in libc on the runtime.
The function I need from libc is getting resolved at the runtime. We don't
need to dlopen on linux machines, but on *BSD its a different story. At
least this is what I inferred.
> I am under impression that libc is inherent part of unix programs. You don't
> need to fiddle with it...
The whole software is dependent on first overriding a function of libc,
and then calling it :-)
--
#!!! If anything can go wrong, _FIX_ it. (To hell with MURPHY)
Ajay kumar Dwivedi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------
The mailing list archives are available at
http://lists.linux-india.org/cgi-bin/wilma/linux-india-help
