Mithun Bhattacharya rearranged electrons thusly:
> Isn't there a fundamental problem here if the normal user has to use
> packages from what the distribution says is unstable and not thoroughly
> tested yet everyone says it is
> "much more secure and faster and more configurable too..."
> It boils down to whether I believe Thats or debian. Personally I believe
> Thats but what should others do ????
In debian, "stable" = "several versions old, ancient history, but absolutely
guaranteed to be stable in that it wont crash / memory leak etc".
I'd suggest, for individual packages, forget what the debian people say - see
what the maintainer of the package says.
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian <--> mallet <at> efn <dot> org
EMail Sturmbannfuhrer, Lower Middle Class Unix Sysadmin
_______________________________________________
linux-india-help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
