-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
+++ Rajkumar Andrews [linux-india] <06/10/01 08:12 +0530>:
> Suresh, I wonder why your office is using such a complicated setup when you
> could have done it all purely in Qmail?
Basically the volume. Qmail is good for delivery (read: DoSsing the
mailserver at the other end by opening one connection for each recipient
instead of sending a series of RCPT TOs, so that mail delivery is not slowed
down by one undeliverable recipient)- but sendmail gives us a lot more
flexiblity for what we need.
> Having said as much I also know that sendmail ***with the right
> configurations*** would also serve well!
Well, yeah, you do have a point there :)
--suresh
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Finger mallet<@>efn.org for key
iD8DBQE7vpASRB4r9e3t77kRAm5VAKCNXQsmFv31p6GBI5GxDuXX1WYEgQCfXTUV
6PL5S2RFDIrJzvT0DSt5rRU=
=3RNK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
linux-india-help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
