Devdas Bhagat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> chittered thus:
Devdas> It was the earlier list policy to set the reply to to go to the list.
Devdas> Sourceforge broke this twice. The first time, it was possible to reset
Devdas> the reply to, but this time that option has been disabled completely.
Devdas>
Devdas> My question is wrt that issue. Resetting the reply to also has a side
Devdas> effect in this case, so I would prefer to know if the current status was
Devdas> acceptable or not.
See this [1] and this [2].
Devdas> > And no, when you post as $luser, I think, it would be way better if you
Devdas> > could post as $[EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than -admin@whatever ...
Devdas>
Devdas> I would prefer this too. And I prefer replies to go to the list rather
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Then do it!
Devdas> Also, not everyone uses mutt, and setting up an identity for each list
Devdas> subscribed to is not always an option.
Someone said _you_ used mutt, and I explained that it was not impossible to
setup send-hook's so that the rest of the universe subscribed to LIG (and
other lists) have to go through so much pain -- Infact, it was just *two*
lines inside your muttrc. I did not for once claim/state that everyone used
(or should use) mutt.
References:
[1] http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
[2] http://www.metasystema.org/essays/reply-to-useful.mhtml
--
________________________________________________________________
/ Larval Geek http://www.ravirao.net/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
| GPG:0xF1E7DE29 CD17 7E7B 67A4 EEC1 FF0A 2757 358A 4A88 F1E7 DE29 |
_______________________________________________
linux-india-help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
