news to me.if you can remember let me know.is a read only public share acceptable?i'm sure that there must be lots of doze boxes with sharing enabled connected to the 'net.i've always wondered about having shares (to be accessed by the local lan) on a doze server connected to the net. regards, manohar
Kingsly John wrote: > On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Dayalan Manohar wrote: > > |i disagree, even with ports firewalled i thought it is better to not > |run samba on a machine connected to the internet.maybe i am wrong? > > There are SMB shares available on the internet... I remember accessing > some when I first configured samba a few years ago.. IIRC the whole kernel > source tree was available on one of the shares. > > I think what matters is how the SMB shares are configured. > > Kingsly > > _______________________________________________ > linux-india-help mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help _______________________________________________ linux-india-help mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
