Thats my point, my option #2 seems much better (now-a-days :-)
Also, I guess the cost of getting the ultra dumb client setup would be higher than smart diskless nodes. ~Mayuresh ---------- >From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> +++ Mayuresh Kathe [linux-india] <19/02/02 14:01 +0530>: >> May I ask why do you wish to go back to the inefficient model of Smart >> Fat Servers and Ultra Dumb Terminals? >> I think given today's hardware costs a better model would be to have >> Averagely Smart Fat Servers and Smart Diskless Clients. >> Also, do you wish to be just on the CUI mode? > > This DOES make sense in several places - such as banks. Citrix Metaframe, > for example, follows option #2 which you point out ... > _______________________________________________ linux-india-help mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
