On Thursday 04 April 2002 15:37 pm, Goutam Baul wrote: > It is a Windows 2000 machine :(
What is Windows 2000? The FTP server of client? If it is the server, then a simple test: binand@binand[~]:(2) nc windows-2000-ftp-server 21 220 windows-2000-ftp-server FTP server (Version wu-2.6.1-16) ready. USER anonymous 331 Guest login ok, send your complete e-mail address as password. PASS [EMAIL PROTECTED] 230 Guest login ok, access restrictions apply. PASV 227 Entering Passive Mode (10,0,2,43,16,150) So, the server supports passive FTP. If the server doesn't, there's not much you can do (for 2.2 kernels, there's an ip_masq_ftp kernel module that works, for 2.4, I guess you need some iptables rules). If the client doesn't support passive FTP, get a better client. IMO, one should always use passive FTP. I believe there were some issues with active FTP (connection hijacking/redirecting/god knows what else) some time ago, and that prompted them to add passive FTP to the protocol. Binand _______________________________________________ linux-india-help mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
