+++ Raju Mathur [30/06/02 08:51 +0530]: > If you're running SM on a mail relay for paying customers this may not > be the ideal behaviour -- you'd prefer that all mail from your > customers which is tagged spam gets redirected to a spammaster who
I would not recommend it. It has been tried, shall we say, at some largish ISPs. Not spamassasin - but homegrown systems that performed back then just like spamassasin does now. Making snap decisions based on content is risky. And spamassasin's default criteria / scores have a rather interesting false positive rate. It is excellent for tagging (not /dev/nulling, mind you) inbound spam. For an outbound mailserver, you are better off with a bulk detector like Vernon Schryver's DCC (http://www.rhyolite.com/dcc/) Also remember that spamassassin is one of the better memory hogs out there. -srs ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ linux-india-help mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
