On 17 Jul 2002 at 21:00, Devdas Bhagat wrote: > > You are incorrect, if that's most proper. That's progammer's boss's decision. > Which sucks. On a large project, it is a good thing to have a decision > maker for major decisions (who has experience and knowledge and skill), > but micromanagement is bad. > And the manager should take into account the developers skills.
I am sure you must have read the story where it starts with an engineer telling his manager that 'it can't be done'. It ends with CEO telling customer that 'your future is safe with us'. Services organisations are like wh**s.. No choice but to provide whatever customer wants. And most of the indian IT industry is like that..Service industry.. > Ouch. (if I was the client, I would be asking for another solution, you > don't upgrade working systems without reason.) 'Rinding the latest and greast' wave/mainframe client terminals aging from hardware point of view/mainframe vendor discontinued support for client hardware model etc.. Nothing worth technically.. Better not comment about non technical reasons.. Bye Shridhar -- QOTD: "It was so cold last winter that I saw a lawyer with his hands in his own pockets." ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ linux-india-help mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
