[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Raju Mathur) [Friday, August 09, 2002 1:59 PM]:
> I'm using Sendmail (you know, the package called Sendmail :) I cannot
> disable nobody@<local host names> in the access file since that'd bust
> the system formmail.pl too. Nor can I write a wrapper -- what will
suidperl? Force perl scripts to run as the UID / GID of the user concerned
rather than as root?
> block on? Once the local SMTP transaction has started there is no way
> of distinguishing between messages sent by the legitimate formmail and
> the rogue ones.
Bulkiness detector like DCC as I said. Seen a spammer hit a formmail or
other insecure cgi? He'll pump a metric shitload of mail through it. DCC
should nail this every time.
> Nope, procmail need an executable sendmail binary to forward messages,
> to bounce them, etc. I don't think dependency is the problem here.
Not really. It can use any damned MTA you like. Qmail or Postfix shouldnt
have any problems at all.
Just have a local delivery setup which points to procmail (using procmail as
the local delivery agent / LDA, or using a .forward mechanism). Procmail
should use the sendmail compatiblity interface just fine, like it uses the
actual sendmail.
-srs
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
linux-india-help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help