On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 19:29:49 -0600, K. Shantanu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > is much more efficient. I am sure that all patches has > > been made for qmail. Now I feel Qmail "SUCKS !!!" > > It is qmail and no sir it does not SUCK. People might say that > when they fail to appreciate the beauty of its modular design and > its code. People (in India too) are handling multiple times that > load on qmail.
As a matter of fact, it does suck. You want to see a modular, clean, scalable MTA? Look at Courier - www.courier-mta.org. It is backwardly compatible to Qmail, so you shouldn't have any trouble upgrading. Binand ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ linux-india-help mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
