On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 04:38:14 -0500, Binand Sethumadhavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We can see the same from now onwards as RHEL too has almost the same > > release cycle as Debian ( 2yrs IIRC) > > That only shows your lack of knowledge of RHEL. RHEL 3.0, released > about 18 months ago, is already at Update 4 - think of them as Service > Packs. For all the included software, later features have been > backported to the RHEL 3.0 version. You get best of both worlds - > newer features AND backward compatibility. >
Debian Stable "Woody" Update 4. Does that make any sense ?? Yes, later features aren't incorporated but security patches are backported to Debian Stable. > > The best part of it is that RHEL 3.0 is GUARANTEED to be supported for > the next five years - even if they release RHEL 4.0 this year or next. > This is commercialization and this is good. This is what I had been thinking when RH didn't have EL range of products. Remember, Debian is a voluntary effort. What else besides the commercialization part makes you feel Debian sucks ?? rrs ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ linux-india-help mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
