On 18/04/05 13:29 +0000, Venkatesh Prashanth wrote: > Hi, > > Found out the problem !!! > It was due to the LVS NAT routing. LVS NAT seems to be slower than LVS DR. > I had modified it to LVS DR and its now reasonably fast. > > I have one question. We don't set quota for our IMAP users. So in the > future the webmail will definitely become slow. Are their any fast
With courier, you do not have that problem in most cases. The problem is if your users leave too many messages in a single folder. In such cases, Cyrus-IMAP may show better performance, but you cannot use Cyrus properly with NFS. > webmails that could query multiple IMAPs with session tracking ? or is > there any effective way to increase the performance on webmail for > huge mailboxes? Cyrus-IMAP with a SAN, or lots of boxes with local disks. Devdas Bhagat ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ linux-india-help mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
