> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:28:59 -0400
> You probably need to add a static route on the ADSL router to your
> 192.168.100.0/24 subnet via 192.168.1.2.
>
> Binand
Thanks. You were bang on target although I did not understand how to go about 
creating the route in the first place (or even if one was needed - afterall 
shorewall was configured for nat and masq). So I tried to put various things 
together again.
Well! Well! I have finally got it!
The first thing I noticed by doing tail -f /var/log/messages was that 
connection requests from the local network (source 192.168.100,3, dest 
192.168.1.2 were being systematically dropped by shorewall). Poking around in 
the shorewall documentation finally brought up a method for enabling a 
routeback between two local subnets. Thus /etc/shorewall/interfaces now 
reads:
#ZONE   INTERFACE       BROADCAST                                       OPTIONS
loc             eth0                    192.168.1.255,192.168.100.25    
routeback

This above created the necessary "route" and bingo!
So thanks once again. 
Now another query: How safe (both in the sense of transmission loss etc. and 
in the sense of security) to have IP aliasing?


> From: Sudev Barar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Or you need to add postrouting+masquerading NAT lines in to your firewall?
> --=20
> Sudev Barar
> Learning Linux
>

Thanks for your response. Shorewall does masq and NAT if you configure it to 
do so (which I did).

Regards
Pramathesh


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
linux-india-help mailing list
linux-india-help@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help

Reply via email to