-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, H.S.Rai wrote: >Please see screenshot. > > http://gndec.ac.in/~hsrai/tmp/sswl.png
I've some problem accessing above site (name not resolvable), on investigating the issue, I found that your institute's DNS admin has probably messed up, with a typo. Following is the output of name resolution from nameservers. - ----8<----8<---- abbe [~] chateau % dig ns ac.in ; <<>> DiG 9.4.1-P1 <<>> ns ac.in ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 63238 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 7, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 7 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;ac.in. IN NS ;; ANSWER SECTION: ac.in. 85973 IN NS c0.cctld.afilias-nst.info. ac.in. 85973 IN NS tld2.ultradns.net. ac.in. 85973 IN NS b1.in.afilias-nst.in. ac.in. 85973 IN NS tld1.ultradns.net. ac.in. 85973 IN NS b0.cctld.afilias-nst.org. ac.in. 85973 IN NS d0.cctld.afilias-nst.org. ac.in. 85973 IN NS a0.cctld.afilias-nst.info. ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: d0.cctld.afilias-nst.org. 85975 IN A 199.254.62.1 a0.cctld.afilias-nst.info. 85975 IN A 199.254.59.1 tld1.ultradns.net. 172211 IN A 204.74.112.1 tld2.ultradns.net. 172211 IN A 204.74.113.1 b0.cctld.afilias-nst.org. 85975 IN A 199.254.60.1 c0.cctld.afilias-nst.info. 85975 IN A 199.254.61.1 b1.in.afilias-nst.in. 86065 IN A 220.226.205.253 ;; Query time: 0 msec ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) ;; WHEN: Thu Jul 24 14:27:17 2008 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 328 abbe [~] chateau % dig ns gndec.ac.in @tld2.ultradns.net. ; <<>> DiG 9.4.1-P1 <<>> ns gndec.ac.in @tld2.ultradns.net. ; (1 server found) ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 4216 ;; flags: qr rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;gndec.ac.in. IN NS ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: gndec.ac.in. 86400 IN NS ns2.comeconnect.com. gndec.ac.in. 86400 IN NS ns1.comconnect.com. ;; Query time: 340 msec ;; SERVER: 204.74.113.1#53(204.74.113.1) ;; WHEN: Thu Jul 24 14:27:35 2008 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 91 - ---->8---->8---- And following is the output of query from Airtel's (my ISP) caching nameserver. - ---->8---->8---- abbe [~] chateau % dig ns gndec.ac.in @202.56.215.6 ; <<>> DiG 9.4.1-P1 <<>> ns gndec.ac.in @202.56.215.6 ; (1 server found) ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 6092 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 2 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;gndec.ac.in. IN NS ;; ANSWER SECTION: gndec.ac.in. 42501 IN NS ns1.comeconnect.com. gndec.ac.in. 42501 IN NS ns2.comeconnect.com. ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: ns1.comeconnect.com. 154875 IN A 202.164.32.81 ns2.comeconnect.com. 154875 IN A 202.164.32.82 ;; Query time: 425 msec ;; SERVER: 202.56.215.6#53(202.56.215.6) ;; WHEN: Thu Jul 24 14:30:27 2008 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 112 - ----8<----8<----- So, to me this seems like a typo in the ac.in. nameservers. > >which indicate two different strength of wireless signal. > >1) Wireless network connection to 'G.Hostel' (45%) >2) Connection properties: wlan0 Signal strength 85% > >Out of these two which is correct or reliable. No ideas :( Ashish - -- ·-- ·- ···· ·--- ·- ···- ·- ·--·-· --· -- ·- ·· ·-·· ·-·-·- -·-· --- -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkiIRToACgkQHy+EEHYuXnT5YgCdEgwJlOIse6eQFPzcFz9YnmJi PsQAoL45erDyphP8xgSqRUtaRHMudKzc =i5eX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ linux-india-help mailing list linux-india-help@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help