On Sat, 22 Sep 2012, Dan Carpenter wrote:

> > What's your opinion on below alternative patch?
> > In addition to yours it makes would-overflow visible.
> > 
> > It does not check for output buffer having non-zero size but
> > as callers are local with #defined buffer size I don't think that would
> > be needed.
> > 
> 
> Sorry for the delay.  Looks good to me.

I am picking Bruno's patch. Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to