On 05/22/2013 10:08 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> The DT support added in ("iio: adc: am335x: Add DT support")
> added an else case which shifts the code to the righ for no reaseon.
> This patch simply removes the pointless else case and shifts the code
> back to the left.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
Either I am going completely mad or I never took the original patch.
I'm not entirely sure I can remember why though. I think there were
issues with another patch in the series and so I was waiting for
a reposting that never happened. Looking back I think the debate
was curriously enough whether it made sense ot have the platform_data
support in there or not.
Did anyone every take any of that series? Which tree did you base these on?
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c | 13 +++++--------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c
> index f258eb0..ac78672 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c
> @@ -214,14 +214,11 @@ static int tiadc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> node = of_get_child_by_name(node, "adc");
> if (!node)
> return -EINVAL;
> - else {
> - err = of_property_read_u32(node,
> - "ti,adc-channels", &val32);
> - if (err < 0)
> - goto err_free_device;
> - else
> - adc_dev->channels = val32;
> - }
> + err = of_property_read_u32(node,
> + "ti,adc-channels", &val32);
> + if (err < 0)
> + goto err_free_device;
> + adc_dev->channels = val32;
> }
>
> indio_dev->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
