On 12/09/2013 10:46 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 10:39:14PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 03:14:26PM -0500, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
>>> Hi Chris,
>>>
>>> On 05/12/13 19:29, Christopher Heiny wrote:
>>>> This patch implements changes to the synaptics-rmi4 branch of
>>>> Dmitry's input tree.  The base for the patch is commit
>>>> 8ca01dc61a42b6f7bcba052a8c084000f7057a34.
>>>>
>>>> This patch primarily reorders the various declarations in rmi_bus.c in 
>>>> order to
>>>> group related elements together, along with some typo fixes.  The code is 
>>>> still
>>>> horribly broken, but this change should make the following fixes easier to
>>>>  review.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Christopher Heiny <[email protected]>
>>>> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
>>>> Cc: Jean Delvare <[email protected]>
>>>> Cc: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
>>>> Cc: Joerie de Gram <[email protected]>
>>>> Cc: Benjamin Tissoires <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> FWIW, I made a review of the patch.
>>> The patches does not only reorder the functions, but also fix some few
>>> things I will detail later (plus fixes of whitespace/comments issues).
>>> It also changes the exported functions as GPL.
>>>
>>> Dmitry, given the current state of the driver (which does not work at
>>> all if I understood correctly), maybe you can pick this one in its
>>> current state.
>>
>> Applied, thank you.
> 
> Well, I had to pull up rmi_debugfs_root declaration to avoid:
> 
>   CC [M]  drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.o
> drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.c: In function ‘rmi_physical_setup_debugfs’:
> drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.c:51:10: error: ‘rmi_debugfs_root’ undeclared
> (first use in this function)
>           rmi_debugfs_root);
> 
> Guys, a bit better compile coverage would be appreciated.

Um, well, OK.  As mentioned in a previous patch, the code is still
horribly broken, although it's getting better.  I should have included
that previous patch's disclaimer with this one.

There's a bunch of debugfs problems in the branch as it stands, such as
failure to compile in certain configurations, kernel panics in others,
problematic initialization sequence, and so on. I was planning to fix
all that in a separate patch following this one, rather than putting
changes in piece meal, or piggybacking the changes onto another patch.

                                        Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to