Hi Chris,

On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 06:44:19PM -0800, Christopher Heiny wrote:
> This patch fixes some bugs in handling of the RMI4 attention line GPIO.
> 
> 1) in enable_sensor(), eliminate the complicated check on ATTN and just 
> call process_interrupt_requests().  This will have minimal overhead if ATTN
> is not asserted, and clears the state of the RMI4 device in any case.
> 
> 2) Correctly free the GPIO in rmi_driver_remove().
> 
> 3) in rmi_driver_probe()
>     - declare the name of the attention gpio (GPIO_LABEL)
>     - use gpio_request_one() to get the gpio and export it.
>     - simplify conditional gpio acquisition logic and combine with interrupt
>       setup
> 
> 4) use gpio_is_valid() instead of comparing to 0.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christopher Heiny <[email protected]>
> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
> Cc: Benjamin Tissoires <[email protected]>
> 
> ---
> 
>  drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.c | 43 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.c b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.c
> index a30c7d3..9b02358 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.c
> @@ -140,7 +140,6 @@ static int enable_sensor(struct rmi_device *rmi_dev)
>       struct rmi_driver_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(&rmi_dev->dev);
>       struct rmi_phys_device *rmi_phys;
>       int retval = 0;
> -     struct rmi_device_platform_data *pdata = to_rmi_platform_data(rmi_dev);
>  
>       if (data->enabled)
>               return 0;
> @@ -169,11 +168,7 @@ static int enable_sensor(struct rmi_device *rmi_dev)
>  
>       data->enabled = true;
>  
> -     if (!pdata->level_triggered &&
> -                 gpio_get_value(pdata->attn_gpio) == pdata->attn_polarity)
> -             retval = process_interrupt_requests(rmi_dev);
> -
> -     return retval;
> +     return process_interrupt_requests(rmi_dev);
>  }
>  
>  static void rmi_free_function_list(struct rmi_device *rmi_dev)
> @@ -800,13 +795,20 @@ static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(rmi_driver_pm, 
> rmi_driver_suspend, rmi_driver_resume);
>  static int rmi_driver_remove(struct device *dev)
>  {
>       struct rmi_device *rmi_dev = to_rmi_device(dev);
> +     const struct rmi_device_platform_data *pdata =
> +                                     to_rmi_platform_data(rmi_dev);
>  
>       disable_sensor(rmi_dev);
>       rmi_free_function_list(rmi_dev);
>  
> +     if (gpio_is_valid(pdata->attn_gpio))
> +             gpio_free(pdata->attn_gpio);

It looks like you let driver registration to continue even if GPIO
request fails. You probably need to introduce a flag indicating whether
you successfully requested gpio or not. Or you can treat failure to
acquire gpio as fatal.

> +
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static const char GPIO_LABEL[] = "attn";
> +
>  static int rmi_driver_probe(struct device *dev)
>  {
>       struct rmi_driver *rmi_driver;
> @@ -937,7 +939,7 @@ static int rmi_driver_probe(struct device *dev)
>               mutex_init(&data->suspend_mutex);
>       }
>  
> -     if (pdata->attn_gpio) {
> +     if (gpio_is_valid(pdata->attn_gpio)) {
>               data->irq = gpio_to_irq(pdata->attn_gpio);
>               if (pdata->level_triggered) {
>                       data->irq_flags = IRQF_ONESHOT |
> @@ -948,24 +950,17 @@ static int rmi_driver_probe(struct device *dev)
>                               (pdata->attn_polarity == RMI_ATTN_ACTIVE_HIGH)
>                               ? IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING : IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING;
>               }
> -     } else
> -             data->poll_interval = ktime_set(0,
> -                     (pdata->poll_interval_ms ? pdata->poll_interval_ms :
> -                     DEFAULT_POLL_INTERVAL_MS) * 1000 * 1000);
> -
> -     if (data->f01_container->dev.driver) {
> -             /* Driver already bound, so enable ATTN now. */
> -             enable_sensor(rmi_dev);
> -     }
>  
> -     if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RMI4_DEV) && pdata->attn_gpio) {

Do you really need to export gpio if you do not have RMI4_DEV option?

> -             retval = gpio_export(pdata->attn_gpio, false);
> +             retval = gpio_request_one(pdata->attn_gpio,
> +                                       GPIOF_EXPORT | GPIOF_DIR_IN,
> +                                       GPIO_LABEL);
>               if (retval) {
> -                     dev_warn(dev, "WARNING: Failed to export ATTN gpio!\n");
> +                     dev_warn(dev, "WARNING: Failed to request ATTN gpio %d, 
> code=%d.\n",
> +                              pdata->attn_gpio, retval);
>                       retval = 0;
>               } else {
>                       retval = gpio_export_link(dev,
> -                                               "attn", pdata->attn_gpio);
> +                                               GPIO_LABEL, pdata->attn_gpio);
>                       if (retval) {
>                               dev_warn(dev,
>                                       "WARNING: Failed to symlink ATTN 
> gpio!\n");
> @@ -975,6 +970,14 @@ static int rmi_driver_probe(struct device *dev)
>                                       pdata->attn_gpio);
>                       }
>               }
> +     } else
> +             data->poll_interval = ktime_set(0,
> +                     (pdata->poll_interval_ms ? pdata->poll_interval_ms :
> +                     DEFAULT_POLL_INTERVAL_MS) * 1000 * 1000);
> +
> +     if (data->f01_container->dev.driver) {
> +             /* Driver already bound, so enable ATTN now. */
> +             enable_sensor(rmi_dev);
>       }
>  
>       return 0;

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to