On Friday, January 10, 2014 12:23:15 PM Christopher Heiny wrote: > On 01/07/2014 12:33 PM, Christopher Heiny wrote: > > Eliminates copy-paste code that handled scans of the Page Descriptor > > Table, > > replacing it with a single PDT scan routine that invokes a callback > > function. The scan routine is not static so that it can be used by the > > firmware update code (under development, not yet submitted). > > > > Updated the copyright dates while we were at it. > > Hi Dmitry, > > Could you apply this or provide some feedback on it? We've got a > pending patch that depends on it, and that pending work will bring the > driver back to a working (if not necessarily beautiful) state. I don't > want to submit it if this change isn't satisfactory, though.
Speaking of the devil. I was just thinking about it and I wanted to ask you to send me an example of how it is used as I can;t make my mind about it. In general it is OK to submit a few patches at a time even if they are depend on each other - it gives me better context (as long as there aren't 80 of those so that I down in them ;) ). Thanks. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
